How groupthink distorts decision-making

„It's easier to ask a critical question than to agree with each other”.

Said no one ever 😉

The comfort of aligning with the group is undeniably seductive.

Unfortunately it leads us also to groupthink and compromising the quality of decisions we make as a team.

The research* highlights four biases that impact decision-making in groupthink:

How group distorts decision making: 1. amplifying errors 2. the cascade effect 3. the shared information effect 4. the polarisation effect

❌ Amplifying errors
Homogeneous groups not only fail to notice errors but also reinforce them through strong agreement.

❌The cascade effect
The tendency to follow the first speaker's lead, building on initial ideas rather than introducing new, independent insights.

❌The polarization effect
Groups tend to solidify their collective stance during meetings, leading to even more increased commitment to poor decisions.

❌The shared information effect
Finding comfort in shared knowledge makes it difficult to consider new or critical viewpoints that could enhance decision quality.

How to get away from groupthink?

✅ Break the mold of „culture fit”
Ensure that the team comprises individuals with varied backgrounds andexperiences

✅Cross-functional collaboration
Encourage collaboration across different departments or specialties to gain insights that might not be apparent within a single-function team.

✅Independent idea generation
Before group discussions, have team members write down their ideas independently and discuss it later.

What would be your suggestions for practices to avoid groupthink?

*Source: Cass R. Sunstein and Reid Hastie "Wiser, Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter" HBR
P. Luthra, S. Muhr, "Leading through bias"

Previous
Previous

there is no discussing allyship without discussing privilege

Next
Next

bias against non-binary employees